baseballlover1 said:
I was thinking more on the subject of zymol today,the question formed in my mind "Are car makers such as porsche, ferrari and other high end car manufacterer's paints that much different to require a different wax or polish??" ...
Car makers make cars. Making cars involves activities like stamping sheet metal, casting bulk metal, machining parts, assembling mechanicals, laying up composites, stitching upholstery,
applying paint and so on.
Car makers
do not make paint. Chemical companies make paint. Car companies
buy paint from chemical companies.
There are many factors that play into what paint company a given manufacturer chooses to work with, what paint system they use and how they set up their paint line.
Paint systems and application processes not only vary from one car or paint company to next but can also vary within a single car company from one factory to the next or even within a given factory from one production run to the next. They certainly change over time within any factory due to coating technology shifts, manufacturing process improvements, tightening environmental restrictions, corporate supply chain contracts and many other reasons.
That’s why it’s not realistic to make blanket statements about paint from one car company or another. At most, you can make approximations based on previous experience.
It’s also why I have to agree with
Accumulator in the belief that marque specific waxes more marketing than chemistry.
baseballlover1 said:
...Like i thought about getting the destiny as a "gift" to some of my best customers in PCA ...
You’d have to do a lot of details to cover the cost of giving a client
Destiny. I’d suggest considering
Glasur instead. It would still be a very nice gesture, it will cost you much less and Zymol tout’s
Glasur’s effects on Porsches. (I know what I said about this sort of thing earlier but this
is marketing that we’re talking about here.)
PC.
